One project that I think is related to Wikilambda's goal of developing a comprehensive repository of functions is the "Function hub" ( https://fno.io/hub/search) that was developed during Ben de Meester's Phd as part of the Function ontology (https://fno.io/).
I think it can be considered as part of the related work and maybe gather some inspiration from it.
Yes, FunctionHub is one interesting project in that space, and it is geared towards expressing the meaning of primitive functions in different formalisms. Another related, interesting project is the http://codeontology.org/
We should make sure to learn lessons from all of these! I wonder how we can set up a system where we can have people who have deeply delved into these topics, participate in our conversations and benefit from their expertise. Simply inviting them to the mailing list doesn't really make the trick.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:49 PM Jose Emilio Labra Gayo jelabra@gmail.com wrote:
One project that I think is related to Wikilambda's goal of developing a comprehensive repository of functions is the "Function hub" ( https://fno.io/hub/search) that was developed during Ben de Meester's Phd as part of the Function ontology (https://fno.io/).
I think it can be considered as part of the related work and maybe gather some inspiration from it.
-- -- Best regards, Jose Labra -- http://labra.weso.es
Abstract-Wikipedia mailing list Abstract-Wikipedia@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/abstract-wikipedia
Quick idea about that: organizing a workshop. Academics want to do academic things, which convert spend time as input into citable artifacts. A traditional workshop would of course require quite a lot of ressources and efforts, but we can capitalize on the current pandemic and the trend of online conferences. This make such event super affordable to setup... and to attend. The biggest issue I saw would be advertising the event so the right people could hear of it and join (maybe http://www.wikicfp.com/cfp/ + some direct contact). And have a publisher (could be 100% online too) for the proceedings would help.
Best regards, Louis Lecailliez
________________________________ De : Abstract-Wikipedia abstract-wikipedia-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org de la part de Denny Vrandečić dvrandecic@wikimedia.org Envoyé : vendredi 17 juillet 2020 16:18 À : General public mailing list for the discussion of Abstract Wikipedia (aka Wikilambda) abstract-wikipedia@lists.wikimedia.org Objet : Re: [Abstract-wikipedia] Related work: The Function hub
Yes, FunctionHub is one interesting project in that space, and it is geared towards expressing the meaning of primitive functions in different formalisms. Another related, interesting project is the http://codeontology.org/
We should make sure to learn lessons from all of these! I wonder how we can set up a system where we can have people who have deeply delved into these topics, participate in our conversations and benefit from their expertise. Simply inviting them to the mailing list doesn't really make the trick.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:49 PM Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.commailto:jelabra@gmail.com> wrote: One project that I think is related to Wikilambda's goal of developing a comprehensive repository of functions is the "Function hub" (https://fno.io/hub/search) that was developed during Ben de Meester's Phd as part of the Function ontology (https://fno.io/).
I think it can be considered as part of the related work and maybe gather some inspiration from it.
-- -- Best regards, Jose Labra -- http://labra.weso.es
_______________________________________________ Abstract-Wikipedia mailing list Abstract-Wikipedia@lists.wikimedia.orgmailto:Abstract-Wikipedia@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/abstract-wikipedia
Quick idea about that: organizing a workshop.
+1 for this, in addition to the generic "coming to particular people with particular questions to start a discussion" method.
Presumably a separate (or not?) workshop for the NLG project of Abstract Wikipedia would also be beneficial at some point.
(Of course, it may make sense for a workshop for Wikilambda to occur much earlier than an Abstract Wikipedia workshop — if they are separate workshops.)
Thanks,
Chris Cooley
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 9:50 AM Louis Lecailliez < louis.lecailliez@outlook.fr> wrote:
Quick idea about that: organizing a workshop. Academics want to do academic things, which convert spend time as input into citable artifacts. A traditional workshop would of course require quite a lot of ressources and efforts, but we can capitalize on the current pandemic and the trend of online conferences. This make such event super affordable to setup... and to attend. The biggest issue I saw would be advertising the event so the right people could hear of it and join (maybe http://www.wikicfp.com/cfp/ + some direct contact). And have a publisher (could be 100% online too) for the proceedings would help.
Best regards, Louis Lecailliez
*De :* Abstract-Wikipedia abstract-wikipedia-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org de la part de Denny Vrandečić dvrandecic@wikimedia.org *Envoyé :* vendredi 17 juillet 2020 16:18 *À :* General public mailing list for the discussion of Abstract Wikipedia (aka Wikilambda) abstract-wikipedia@lists.wikimedia.org *Objet :* Re: [Abstract-wikipedia] Related work: The Function hub
Yes, FunctionHub is one interesting project in that space, and it is geared towards expressing the meaning of primitive functions in different formalisms. Another related, interesting project is the http://codeontology.org/
We should make sure to learn lessons from all of these! I wonder how we can set up a system where we can have people who have deeply delved into these topics, participate in our conversations and benefit from their expertise. Simply inviting them to the mailing list doesn't really make the trick.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:49 PM Jose Emilio Labra Gayo jelabra@gmail.com wrote:
One project that I think is related to Wikilambda's goal of developing a comprehensive repository of functions is the "Function hub" ( https://fno.io/hub/search) that was developed during Ben de Meester's Phd as part of the Function ontology (https://fno.io/).
I think it can be considered as part of the related work and maybe gather some inspiration from it.
-- -- Best regards, Jose Labra -- http://labra.weso.es
Abstract-Wikipedia mailing list Abstract-Wikipedia@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/abstract-wikipedia
Abstract-Wikipedia mailing list Abstract-Wikipedia@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/abstract-wikipedia
+1 with a tiny twist: Maybe a combination of both. We’ve been organizing some “invited workshops” in the multilingual Constructicography community, where we define some key questions/tasks, have the groups report on their approach to them and invite external people to comment/offer different perspectives on the initiative. A similar thing are the International FrameNet Workshops.
Em sáb, 18 de jul de 2020 às 11:14, Chris Cooley < chris.cooley.mail@gmail.com> escreveu:
Quick idea about that: organizing a workshop.
+1 for this, in addition to the generic "coming to particular people with particular questions to start a discussion" method.
Presumably a separate (or not?) workshop for the NLG project of Abstract Wikipedia would also be beneficial at some point.
(Of course, it may make sense for a workshop for Wikilambda to occur much earlier than an Abstract Wikipedia workshop — if they are separate workshops.)
Thanks,
Chris Cooley
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 9:50 AM Louis Lecailliez < louis.lecailliez@outlook.fr> wrote:
Quick idea about that: organizing a workshop. Academics want to do academic things, which convert spend time as input into citable artifacts. A traditional workshop would of course require quite a lot of ressources and efforts, but we can capitalize on the current pandemic and the trend of online conferences. This make such event super affordable to setup... and to attend. The biggest issue I saw would be advertising the event so the right people could hear of it and join (maybe http://www.wikicfp.com/cfp/ + some direct contact). And have a publisher (could be 100% online too) for the proceedings would help.
Best regards, Louis Lecailliez
*De :* Abstract-Wikipedia abstract-wikipedia-bounces@lists.wikimedia.org de la part de Denny Vrandečić dvrandecic@wikimedia.org *Envoyé :* vendredi 17 juillet 2020 16:18 *À :* General public mailing list for the discussion of Abstract Wikipedia (aka Wikilambda) abstract-wikipedia@lists.wikimedia.org *Objet :* Re: [Abstract-wikipedia] Related work: The Function hub
Yes, FunctionHub is one interesting project in that space, and it is geared towards expressing the meaning of primitive functions in different formalisms. Another related, interesting project is the http://codeontology.org/
We should make sure to learn lessons from all of these! I wonder how we can set up a system where we can have people who have deeply delved into these topics, participate in our conversations and benefit from their expertise. Simply inviting them to the mailing list doesn't really make the trick.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:49 PM Jose Emilio Labra Gayo < jelabra@gmail.com> wrote:
One project that I think is related to Wikilambda's goal of developing a comprehensive repository of functions is the "Function hub" ( https://fno.io/hub/search) that was developed during Ben de Meester's Phd as part of the Function ontology (https://fno.io/).
I think it can be considered as part of the related work and maybe gather some inspiration from it.
-- -- Best regards, Jose Labra -- http://labra.weso.es
Abstract-Wikipedia mailing list Abstract-Wikipedia@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/abstract-wikipedia
Abstract-Wikipedia mailing list Abstract-Wikipedia@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/abstract-wikipedia
Abstract-Wikipedia mailing list Abstract-Wikipedia@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/abstract-wikipedia
abstract-wikipedia@lists.wikimedia.org