On 29 November 2013 13:08, Andrew Gray <andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk> wrote:
The difference is limited in practice - the government
still gets
money that we don't - but it is a bit confusing to treat it as a
£200,000 outgoing when we never actually see it.
We can express it in a much clearer way:
"For every £1 you donate, less than half is spent on the stated
outcomes of the charity".
So, if claiming the tax back might push the charity into becoming
*more* than 50% "efficient", it seems worth the effort.
Fae
--
faewik(a)gmail.com
http://j.mp/faewm