On 17 May 2016 at 00:15, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Problem is that the document suffers from being to
broad and too safe
of most people to form much of an opinion about. Indeed its hard to
have an opinion on "We promote the values inherent in the concept of
open knowledge" beyond that statement being largely meaningless.
To be clear I'm not saying that the document in general is meaningless
just that it covers the kind of broad stuff that people tend not to be
too interested in. My actual feedback can be found on the talk page.
--
geni