But Gordo, how would you expect the wider volunteer community to amend the
Articles other than by debating and voting on a resolution at an AGM (or EGM)?
Volunteers who are not members, for whatever reason, can still make their views
known, even if they have no legal entitlement to vote.
I'd be interested in any ideas to increase participation, of course.
--
Doug
On 12 May 2016 at 10:18 Gordon Joly
<gordon.joly(a)pobox.com> wrote:
On 11/05/16 23:34, Rex X wrote:
To that end, if you feel that there are specific issues to be mentioned or
specific wording that would be an improvement to our Articles, then please
do
suggest them - preferably on-wiki so that we can have a broad discussion,
and
you have my promise that I'll raise them with the Board with a view to an
AGM
resolution, if needed.
Yes, a resolution at an AGM, as has happened in the past.
Those Articles that are a legal entity, for which the members of charity
have a right to amend? And not the wider volunteer community?
Gordo
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
https://wikimedia.org.uk