It is clear that the board protected Roger. It is
not clear that they did
so because of an overfamiliarity among the board. I think they probably
thought they were just being supportive colleagues.
On Oct 8, 2012 10:36 AM, "Gordon Joly" <gordon.joly(a)pobox.com> wrote:
On 08/10/12 10:35, David Gerard wrote:
On 8 October 2012 09:09, Andy Mabbett
<pigsotwing(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 7, 2012 8:24 PM, "Gordon Joly" <gordon.joly(a)pobox.com> wrote:
>
>> It seems clear that being friends allows a group to protect an
>> individual,
>> when that person (e.g. Roger Bamkin) should asked to consider his
>> position.
>> It appears that he was protected.
>>
> You've obviously seen some evidence that the rest of us have not.
> Perhaps
> it's time you shared that with us.
>
+1
Gordon, you've been called on unsubstantiated sniping before. If you
have something to say, say it.
- d.
Did the board reject Roger's resignations in the past?
Gordo
______________________________**_________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l<http://mail.w…
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org