On 09/11/12 19:22, Katie Chan wrote:
With respect, it's simply not a case of merely appearing as
politically correct.
Indeed. Somebody should have carried out an Equality Impact
Assessment
on the survey and the methods used.
I also question the fact that the first survey was tied to a member's
identity and a member had to request an anonymous survey. Why not make
the survey anonymous (with an identity token given to all members to
ensure that only members replied) with an option to sign the survey?
Gordo