It would be good to see the actual proposal before jumping to conclusions.
Shaming somebody based on hearsay is rather unfair...
On Oct 6, 2012 5:37 PM, "Katie Chan" <ktc(a)ktchan.info> wrote:
Fae has opened a discussion on the UK wiki water
cooler on a current
discussions within WMUK Board to institute a concept of collective
responsibility[1].
This is an absolutely horrendous proposal and goes right against the heart
of the principles of openness and transparency which underpins the
Wikimedia movement, and upon which Wikimedia UK was founded on. Even the
WMF Board now list individual trustees' votes on a resolution[2]. This is
nothing more than a half-assed attempt to hide division within the heart of
the current board of trustees that only serve to reduce accountability of
individual trustee and damages the chapter.
Whoever proposed this, shame on you!
KTC
[1]: <http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/**Water_cooler#Trustees_and_.**
22cabinet_voting.22<http://uk.wikimedia.org/wiki/Water_cooler#Trustees_a…
[2]:
<http://wikimediafoundation.**org/wiki/Resolution:Board_of_**
Trustees_Voting_Transparency<http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Resolut…
--
Experience is a good school but the fees are high.
- Heinrich Heine
______________________________**_________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l<http://mail.w…
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org