If the QR code is for use on mobile phones then we may not want much more
than a stub either. What is the maximum article size that would work on the
typical modern phone?
WereSpielChequers
On 25 October 2011 23:32, Brian McNeil <brian.mcneil(a)wikinewsie.org> wrote:
That's the sort of feedback I'm looking for,
thanks.
I've no intention of vigorously arguing one way or the other, but I just
feel it is inappropriate to point to a Wikipedia article that may never
get much beyond stub status when orders of magnitude more content is
elsewhere on WMF projects.
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 23:07 +0100, Andy Mabbett wrote:
On 25 October 2011 22:55, Brian McNeil
<brian.mcneil(a)wikinewsie.org>
wrote:
All good stuff, but...
> A QR code could be placed at a relevant war memorial, it points to
> a Wikibook collecting all the soldiers' letters, with scans and
transcripts.
I'd rather the QR code point (via QRpedia) to a Wikipedia article
about the memorial, and have that point to relevant pages on commons/
Wikisource, and the book.
Brian McNeil.
--
http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Brian_McNeil - Accredited Reporter.
Facts don't cease to be facts, but news ceases to be news.
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia UK mailing list
wikimediauk-l(a)wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l
WMUK:
http://uk.wikimedia.org