On 29 April 2012 13:08, Harry Burt <harryaburt(a)gmail.com> wrote:
In any case, role accounts are in all practical terms
regarded merely
an accountability issue these days. Which is probably why no page goes
into detail on the copyright matter.
It also seems quite at odds with the fact that we *do* allow and
assist organisations to release content under a free license - just so
long as they go through another process. There are practical
identification and verification benefits to doing it this way, but it
certainly doesn't support any kind of copyright limitation.
(I am becoming of the opinion that prohibiting role accounts is a bad
idea full stop, but that's another story...)
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk