Hi Lucy,
Is there an analysis somewhere for the new outcomes in the strategy
and the Objects (M3) in the Articles of Association showing how well
it meets that core?
Increasing access to "UK cultural heritage" seems to be something in
addition to the Objects, as well as the one about "learners". These
are good areas with past projects banked, but by prioritizing these as
measurable outcomes, proposals for projects that might be focused on
say, engaging the elderly rather than educating them, or projects
where the domain of knowledge lies mainly in non-UK cultural heritage
material, such as international politics or international artworks,
would be of a lesser priority.
If the charity is spending its budget on projects in a way that looks
increasingly different to the current Articles of Association, it may
be sensible to consider amending them for a members resolution at the
forthcoming AGM rather than deferring for another year.
Thanks,
Fae
On 11 May 2016 at 14:05, Lucy Crompton-Reid
<lucy.crompton-reid(a)wikimedia.org.uk> wrote:
Dear all
Over the past few months I have been leading the process of reviewing and
refreshing Wikimedia UK's strategic framework, and developing a new business
plan for 2016 - 19. The draft strategic framework sets out a new vision for
the charity and I would love to hear from volunteers, members and other
stakeholders about whether you support the proposed direction of travel. The
process so far has involved a board away day in December, a planning session
with the staff team, and a review of the draft documents at the board
meeting in March. Community consultation on the strategic framework forms an
important part of this process and will run until the end of this month.
https://wikimedia.org.uk/wiki/2016_Strategy_Consultation
The planned outputs from the strategic planning process will be a clear,
concise strategic framework for the period 2016 to 2019, which outlines our
vision, mission, values, planned outcomes, strategic goals and objectives
and major programme strands, plus a three year business plan which puts the
strategy in context, articulating the external context and drivers, planned
priorities and programmes for the three year period and internal resources
including staffing and funding.
When considering the draft strategic framework, I would be particularly keen
for you to bear these questions in mind - although please don't feel that
you have to answer all (or indeed any) of them:
1. Do you agree with the overall strategic framework proposed? If not,
why/what changes would you like to suggest?
2. Is there anything missing?
3. How should WMUK prioritise activities?
4. How can we work with you on delivering the strategy?
You can respond to this consultation by Monday 30th May 2016 by adding your
thoughts to the talk page or by sending an email to me on
lucy.crompton-reid(a)wikimedia.org.uk.
With best wishes and many thanks
Lucy
--
Lucy Crompton-Reid
Chief Executive
Wikimedia UK
+44 (0) 207 065 0991
--
faewik(a)gmail.com
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Fae