On 6 February 2013 09:32, Charles Matthews
<charles.r.matthews(a)ntlworld.com> wrote:
On 6 February 2013 09:30, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I don't want background. I want you to
publish the report now. You don't
need any more response than "we're looking at it and are beginning
discussions with the community, we'll have a fuller response in a few
weeks". You could have written that months ago.
Last time you used the "we need to prepare a response" excuse to delay
publishing something you ended up publishing it without any response anyway
and nothing bad happened, so your good faith is very much in doubt.
Tom, cut it out. In the bigger picture it is going to be much more
important that WMUK members hold the Board to implementation of the
report.
It's rather hard to know if it will be important to implement the
report without having read it... I have no idea what the
recommendations are.
When you are forced to co-commission a report into your own failings,
making excuses not to publish it doesn't reflect well on you.