Hoi,
If this stands on its own, ok. It does not, it is part and parcel of the
bias you find in English Wikipedia. Informing about one case does not
negate even address the obsession with rules.
Thanks,
GerardM
On Sat, 4 Apr 2020 at 02:03, Aron Demian <aronmanning5(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 21:49, Joe Corneli
<holtzermann17(a)gmail.com> wrote:
This section fills in some of the gaps left by
the statement: "It is not
only people who do not care for rules, it is also the people who obsess
about rules."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarice_Phelps#Wikipedia_article
A little history:
Clarice Phelps is notable both as a scientist and for being deleted from
Wikipedia as non-notable :-), which resulted in significant media coverage.
The admin "Rama" tried to "do the right thing" in the wrong manner
by
restoring the article and - without supporters - lost his tools:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Rama#Locu…
Demian (Aron)
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l