I don’t think userboxes are the best thing to use as evidence for any claim
On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 23:38, Nick Wilson (Quiddity) <nwilson(a)wikimedia.org>
wrote:
See also
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Userboxes/Health/Mental
and semi-related
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Userboxes/Personality
plus the essays
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Obsessive%E2%80%93compulsive_disord…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:High-functioning_autism_and_Asperge…
(plus the French and Chinese Wikipedia's equivalent pages for that second
essay, which likely have different content)
Sidenote: I worry about those userboxes, for the same reasons mentioned in
this thread. I wonder if there ought to be a warning at the top of that
listing-page, reminding editors to be careful... [but userboxes are a
complicated can of worms, and it's probably been discussed before, so I
won't wade into it.]
--Quiddity
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
Wiki-research-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
--
Thanks,
Samuel