On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 7:49 AM, DaB. <WP(a)daniel.baur4.info> wrote:
Hello,
At Friday 05 February 2010 15:45:21 DaB. wrote:
I requested such a policy (with a draft (even a
english one))
If somebody is interested, the DRAFT can be found under [1]. I updated it
today and added some stuff from the discussion here. I'm of corse
interested
in response (and fixing of my bad english), but I can't guarantee that it
will
ever accept by the WMDE.
Sincerly,
DaB.
[1]
https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Toollizenz/draft/en
--
wp-blog.de
_______________________________________________
Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org)
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
Posting guidelines for this list:
https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette
Looks good, but there is one bit in the page that has a bit of unclear
wording:
"The source code of every tool is licensed under a free (like BSD) or *
GPL-compatible*[1]<https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Toollizenz/draft/en#…
license
by default, if it is at all possible. If this is not possible due to a less
free component (like a code library), the source code adopts the license of
the library by default."
Would it be safe to say that the source code would be dual-licensed here, or
am I reading it wrong?
Titoxd.