On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 7:49 AM, DaB. <WP@daniel.baur4.info> wrote:
Hello,
At Friday 05 February 2010 15:45:21 DaB. wrote:
> I requested such a policy (with a draft (even a english one))

If somebody is interested, the DRAFT can be found under [1]. I updated it
today and added some stuff from the discussion here. I'm of corse interested
in response (and fixing of my bad english), but I can't guarantee that it will
ever accept by the WMDE.

Sincerly,
DaB.

[1] https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Toollizenz/draft/en

--
wp-blog.de

_______________________________________________
Toolserver-l mailing list (Toolserver-l@lists.wikimedia.org)
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/toolserver-l
Posting guidelines for this list: https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Mailing_list_etiquette

Looks good, but there is one bit in the page that has a bit of unclear wording:

"The source code of every tool is licensed under a free (like BSD) or GPL-compatible[1] license by default, if it is at all possible. If this is not possible due to a less free component (like a code library), the source code adopts the license of the library by default."

Would it be safe to say that the source code would be dual-licensed here, or am I reading it wrong?  

Titoxd.