Exactly; we give a list of revision_ids, with the
probability that each is
vandalized, and also, with their date.
The date is important, as sometimes you want to check manually that
revisions that are too old are rendered properly (no broken templates). I
don't think Martin ran into this problem, but we provide this information in
any case.
We are working hard to complete this procedure, however, we topped
with some drawbacks such as the importance categorization process that
is nonexistent in the Spanish version. It would be interesting to find
a more automated.
The screening tool is excellent and we will facilitate the review
process of articles. There is little human action, however, we have a
strong will to carry out this process.
The approach selected is similar to that of WP 1.0 in English,
however, can not use the same list of items for cultural differences
(different languages belong to different persons, places, countries,
sentatives, etc..), but , there may be many similarities.
--
Lcdo. Wilfredo Rafael Rodríguez Hernández
msn,googletalk = wilfredor(a)gmail.com
blog =
http://wilfredor.blogspot.com
"Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given
free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're
doing."