Folks,
Even though I know most of cringe when we find a source that is behind a
paywall, I think that we should treat it as marginally better than a
offline source. For those, Wikipedia:Offline sources
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Offline_sources> states
"Wikipedia's reliable sources guideline
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources>
states that articles should be sourced with reliable, third-party,
published sources. *Even though Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, there
is no distinction between using online versus offline sources."* (Source
emphasis, not mine)
This is what I do for such citations.
1. I add "{{closed access}} " (including that space) before the citation
template.
2. I set the parameter |subscription=yes
3. If there is an OCLC # available, I set the parameter |oclc= so that a
reader can go find the print source in a library.
4. If it is appropriate to include the parameter |issn= along with or
instead of the |oclc= parameter, then I use that.
For some universities, colleges, & libraries, access to some online
database will be free to their students / faculty / staff / patrons, so
there definitely is a value to including to URL or DOI for those cases.
Yours,
Peaceray
--
User:Peaceray
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Mitar <mmitar(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi!
This reminds me of ugly practices of proprietary software companies
giving free software to students so that they are able to learn the
tools and then later on have to pay. So we will be making links to
paywalled journals and we will be able to do it for free, but then our
readers will have to pay to read them? So Wikipedia will provide free
advertisements for paywalled content? Nicely done, nicely done.
This is not open access. This direct opposite to open access. We
should not be proud of this.
(Please don't take this as an attack on anybody personally and I think
The Wikipedia Library Team is doing a great job, but I really feel
this is a bad deal. And it was sent to the open access mailing list.
Which this is not.)
Mitar
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Jake Orlowitz <jorlowitz(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi!
The Wikipedia Library has new, free research donations available:
NEW
*DeGruyter: 1000 accounts for English and German-language research, sign
up
on one of two language Wikipedias:
English signup <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:De_Gruyter>
German signup <https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:De_Gruyter>
*Fold3: 100 accounts for American history and military archives
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fold3>
*Scotland's People: 100 accounts for Scottish Genealogy database
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ScotlandsPeople>
EXPANDED
*British Newspaper Archive: 100+ new accounts for British Newspapers
archives
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BNA>
OPEN
*Highbeam: 100+ accounts for newspapers and magazines
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:HighBeam>
*Questia: 100+ accounts for various aggregated journals and social
science
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Questia>
*JSTOR: 100+ accounts for journal archives
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:JSTOR>
Accounts are available to ALL global editors with a 1 year old account
and
1000 edits. Please notify your local community
about the signups.
Signups
for now are mostly on English Wikipedia, UNLESS
you have started a local
Wikipedia Library branch like we've done on Arabic, Chinese, and
German. To
get started, please contact Ocaasi at
[[m:User:Ocaasi (WMF)]] or
ocaasi(a)wikimedia.org
Thanks!
The Wikipedia Library Team
<http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/The_Wikipedia_Library>
_______________________________________________
OpenAccess mailing list
OpenAccess(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/openaccess
--
http://mitar.tnode.com/
https://twitter.com/mitar_m
_______________________________________________
GLAM mailing list
GLAM(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam