Kudos Barbara, I read the blog and totally agree with you regarding the fact that contents, after being free and available, need a further processing so as to make them reusable by various entry points (bloggers, bots, scientists, artists, etc). You could focus on that aspect, the reusability of data. The Wikidata project stands out as a perfect paragon of this concept. Explaining how the structured-data approach of wikidata itself can facilitate content reusability across various targets could be valuable. Cheers, Sent from my Asus Zenfone 5, excuse the brevity. Le 26 janv. 2017 22:42, "Barbara Fischer" <barbara.fischer(a)wikimedia.de> a écrit : _______________________________________________ GLAM mailing list GLAM(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam

This is awesome Barbara: Kudos! Generally, the next couple years should be a growing set of opportunities between Europeana and Wikimedia communities. Wikidata is mature enough to be useful, Structured Data on Commons is coming (which means the kinds of data needed for media data, will also be enriched by our community), and Europeana continues to invest in programming that brings the communities closer. I think one of the biggest challenges (and I am actually talking to folks in DPLA about this too), is making sure that all the work on identifiers that we integrate into Wikidata also finds its way into matching institutional metadata. Gently pushing in that direction would be awesome :) Cheers, Alex On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Samuel Guebo <samuelguebo(a)gmail.com> wrote: -- Alex Stinson GLAM-Wiki Strategist Wikimedia Foundation Twitter:@glamwiki/@sadads Learn more about how the communities behind Wikipedia, Wikidata and other Wikimedia projects partner with cultural heritage organizations: http://glamwiki.org _______________________________________________ GLAM mailing list GLAM(a)lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/glam