Stephen, Oscar,
Oh, sawa. Speaking of students council, that's what happens at strath as well. Thanks for clarifying.
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 20:37:48 +0300 From: wanjaustev@gmail.com To: wikimediake@lists.wikimedia.org Subject: Re: [Wikimedia Kenya] Bylaws: ChapCom's Comments
We should let the electorate decide who they want to be the chairperson,secretary, vice and so forth unlike when the board members are left to the task.
About having too many volunteers vying for one post and having only one vying for another is quite 'normal'. I believe the many who go for a certain post e.g. treasurer would probably not settle for another post in the board. And again, the board may choose a candidate who is not a representative who the members want at the post.
The board should be a representation of the members voices.
For instance, Our student council at JKUAT, the vice and secretary general were elected unopposed since they did not have opponents whereas the chairmans position had 5 contestants, the finance docket had 3 contestants e.t.c. They were sworn in with no squalms since the rest of the students body had been given a window period to submit nomination papers-which they didnt.I hope am clear.
Cheers
Stephen W. Wanjau
On Jul 13, 2011 8:05 PM, "Limoke Oscar" oslimoke@gmail.com wrote:
Abbas, I think someone would vie for a post s/he thinks he can comfortably
serve.I mean I wouldnt say vie for a secretary if am not interestde.Let someone choose a position s/he thinks he is in a position to serve. Another drawback is that how would the 'creme de le creme' decide
amongst themselves who should be chair,vice ans staff?wouldn't this cause some cold blood and tension among themselves?
On 7/13/11, Abbas Mahmood abbasjnr@hotmail.com wrote:
Oscar,
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:37:57 +0300 From: oslimoke@gmail.com To: wikimediake@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikimedia Kenya] Bylaws: ChapCom's Comments
About Electing the Board,members should be electing a position based.i.e electing X for the post of Chairperson and so forth....
Erm, I think this type of method has a disadvantage: for instance, 5 people vie for the Chairperson seat and maybe only 1 person vies for the Secretary post; definitely, the Secretary will get elected; since (s)he has no
competitor, and maybe out of the 4 that lost the Chair's seat, one of them could have been a better Board member than the secretary who had won. What I'm trying to say is that i think it's better for voters to vote for their
best top 5 candidates; and the Board members will later on delegate their respective positions themselves. By doing so, we will get the creme de la creme to be on the Board. Abbas.
-- Limoke Oscar, mayenge.blogspot.com Freelancer, GeoInformatics and GIScience Student
WikimediaKE mailing list WikimediaKE@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediake
_______________________________________________ WikimediaKE mailing list WikimediaKE@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediake