[Wikimedia-l] Monobook was optimised for editors, Vector is more balanced between readers and edtors

[User Mono]

How are the edit functions in Monobook more prominent than in Vector?

> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:24:52 +0100
> From: nemowiki at gmail.com
> To: wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Monobook was optimised for editors, Vector is more balanced between readers and edtors
> 
> WereSpielChequers, 22/11/2013 08:03:
> > But it would be interesting to see some stats on the relative
> > retention and upgrading of editors who use monobook and Vector.
> 
> The idea sounds crazy, but yes, why not, let's test this. I believe you 
> can put your thoughts on a Meta-Wiki Research: page, describing the 
> background, the A/B test and the proposed analysis, and then ask the WMF 
> to run it (preferably with the consensus of the target wikis, but it's 
> not usually considered necessary for so-called experimentations).
> 
> Nemo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l, <mailto:wikimedia-l-request at lists.wikimedia.org?subject=unsubscribe>