[Wikimedia-l] Office hour inside out (program evaluation)

[WereSpielChequers]

We shouldn't criticise people for coming up with programs such as IEP and
AFT, but we should look at how long it took to stop them after serious
opposition arose and major flaws were pointed out. As a movement we need to
get much better at switching our efforts from blind alleys to things that
we can get consensus for.

WSC

Message: 1

> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 16:19:41 +0100
> From: "Federico Leva (Nemo)" <nemowiki at gmail.com>
> To: Wikimedia Mailing List <wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
> Cc: ENWP Pine <deyntestiss at hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Wikimedia-l] Office hour inside out (program evaluation)
> Message-ID: <514B250D.8040301 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
>
> ENWP Pine, 21/03/2013 05:48:
> > I'd also suggest that people read the report about
> > projects that encountered significant problems at
> > WMF, particularly the IEP,
>
> I suppose the past tense here means that
> <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/IEP/Welcome> should be tagged
> {{historical}} rather than {{draft}}?
>
> > and a more recent example
> > is the mixed reception to AFT5. I hope that program
> > managers at WMF learn both good practices and what
> > to avoid. I also hope that WMF ties program metrics
> > to evaluations for the responsible supervisors when
> > considering whether to continue or renew
> > employment contracts, as well as when
> > considering promotions.
>
> Nemo
>
>
>