[Wikimedia-l] Proposal to use the internal wiki more

[Mathieu Stumpf]

Le 2013-04-03 12:34, Michael Peel a écrit :
> # Agreements, particularly those with global impact, and/or where
> they affect more than one Wikimedia organisation. Part of the recent
> Monmouthpedia/Gibraltarpedia situation was caused by a lack of
> transparency about who had signed what agreements, and when they had
> been signed - if these had all been shared on an internal wiki then
> some of this could have been avoided. There's also a lot of 
> experience
> now with existing agreements that could be reused when new agreements
> are being written, e.g. for Wikimedians in Residences. Sadly, not all
> of these can be made publicly available (or at least, they haven't
> been to date).

Can you provide more information on this case? I never heard about 
Monmouthpedia/Gibraltarpedia despite they had a "global impact".

Would anyone be kind enough to explain me what kind of secret stuff we 
are talking about?

-- 
Association Culture-Libre
http://www.culture-libre.org/