[Wikimedia-l] Why is not free?

[Nathan]

On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton <
rodrigo.argenton at gmail.com> wrote:

> Do you read my email?
> *
> me:we can make a logo under a free license, with the trademark rights
> guaranteed.*
> *
> you:that the logos are not released under a free license because they are
> trademarks.*
>
>
> idealists?
> sorry?
>
> If you will start to attack me, at least learn to read. And reading your
> text, sorry, but your knowledge of license, is shallow.
>
> And I'm unhappy with the fact that we have values and do not put it in
> all our instances. Not with anything you said. I know various projects that
> images of their logos are under a free license, this is not idealism, is to
> be what we ask others to be.
>
> I do not know to be aggressive in an argument that you are not obliged
> to participate
> and you was not even mentioned... *This I do not understand at all.*
>
>
> *PS:I just inquired three times the answers, if I can not do more, I think
> Stalin was right. I'm going to Siberia.*
>
>
> --
> Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton
> rodrigo.argenton at gmail.com
> +55 11 7971-8884
>


You're not winning any hearts and minds communicating in this style.
Perhaps you should find someone who can more persuasively and politely
argue your points and hand it off to them; repeating yourself in
progressively more surly tones is not going to get you what you want.