[Wikimedia-l] OFFICE actions and WMF image tagging

[Philippe Beaudette]

No, that was clumsy wording.  I did not mean that it could have been used
in THIS instance; I meant that in future instances, I can see circumstances
where it could be used.
___________________
Philippe Beaudette
Director, Community Advocacy
Wikimedia Foundation, Inc.

415-839-6885, x 6643

philippe at wikimedia.org



On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <nemowiki at gmail.com>wrote:

> Philippe Beaudette, 03/07/2012 21:05:
>
>  And that's precisely why we would like a global ban policy implemented. We
>> would prefer an established, community-monitored process that we can turn
>> to when at all possible (and make no mistake, in this case it was needed;
>> I
>> wish we could give all the specifics, but for privacy reasons, we just
>> can't).  Because we didn't have that, we had to break new ground with the
>> Office actions policy.  I hope we never have to use that again.
>>
>
> Unless the current draft is completely off track, what you're saying here
> is that the proposed system could have been used here, which implies the
> specifics *could* be discussed publicly, as the proposed system requires a
> public RfC. <https://meta.wikimedia.org/**wiki/Global_bans#Obtaining_**
> consensus_for_a_global_ban<https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Global_bans#Obtaining_consensus_for_a_global_ban>
> >
>
> Nemo
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.**org <Wikimedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l>
>