[WikiEN-l] News agencies are not RSs

Michel Vuijlsteke wikipedia at zog.org
Tue Jun 30 14:46:02 UTC 2009


2009/6/30 Gwern Branwen <gwern0 at gmail.com>

> Even if we think *they* were not a RS (which of course they are),
> there were still other sources:
>
> "Word came close to leaking widely last month when Rohde won his
> second Pulitzer Prize, as part of the Times team effort for coverage
> of Afghanistan and Pakistan. The Italian news agency Adnkronos
> International did spill the beans, reportedly spurring a number of
> blogs into action."
>
> http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25673247-2703,00.html
>

Sorry, Adnkronos International is not a reliable source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_S._Rohde&diff=next&oldid=277012138

<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_S._Rohde&diff=next&oldid=277012138>
Michel


More information about the WikiEN-l mailing list