[WikiEN-l] Missed Opportunities to have avoided the Durova Case

[Alec Conroy]

On 11/28/07, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 28/11/2007, jayjg <jayjg99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > If an admin refuses to publicly reveal the reasons for blocking
> > someone, one alternative is to reveal them to the Arbitration
> > Committee, which she did.
>
> Can you show that there is community consensus in support of this power grab?


"power grab" is a little too Assuming Bad Faith for my taste, but it's
clear Durova's secret evidence that neither the community nor the
admins at large could review was a substantial departure from previous
history.

And it's also quite clear from the RFC that the community didn't care
for it one bit.