[WikiEN-l] Major dysfunction in RfA Culture

[Earle Martin]

On 15/04/07, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 15/04/07, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Given the number of de-facto inactive admins we already have I don't
> > see much benefit in that approach.
>
> 1. It would reduce the harmfulness to the community of the present RFA.
> 2. "De-facto inactive admins" do not harm the project.

I have never understood why Geni considers "paper admins" (a phrase he
has used a number of times since I've been reading this list) to be
harmful. Geni, would you care to explain?


-- 
Earle Martin
            http://downlode.org/
http://purl.org/net/earlemartin/