RETRACTION Re: [WikiEN-l] Arbitrators: please note that 172 violated his 1 revert pledge

[actionforum at comcast.net]

Apologies,

Upon review, his previous revert was more than 24 hours earlier.  I don't know what the time frame of his pledge was, but perhaps this was outside it.
           -- Silverback

-------------- Original message -------------- 

> In researching the criteria for blocking and its abuse, I noticed that 172 has 
> an issue before arbitrarion. A point that seemed to count in his favor was his 
> taking of the one revert pledge. Note that he was one of the reverters making 
> alleging that my post was original research, evidently common sense application 
> of the meaning of words is not allowed. He just reverted my contribution again, 
> his second in a few hours. 
> 
> Integrity should require the votes on that issue to be reversed, since his 
> pledge was meaningless. 
> 
> Hopefully, we can work together to make wikipedia open and accountable. 
> 
> -- thanx, 
> Silverback 
> _______________________________________________ 
> WikiEN-l mailing list 
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org 
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l