[WikiEN-l] Attempts to ban me by Raul654, Zero and Simonides

[Nathan Russell]

On Sun, 19 Sep 2004 16:52:16 -0500, Phil Sandifer
<sandifer at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> At the risk of feeding the trolls.
> 
> 1. Raul did not say you made an ad hominem attack. He said that your
> defense was ad hominem - that is, you were defending yourself by
> criticizing your accusers, instead of by engaging the evidence in any
> way.
> 
> 2. Raul did not refuse to look at evidence. He asked you to present him
> with evidence. "Read this talk page" is not evidence. Evidence would be
> a link to a specific problem edit.
> 
> 3. I'm not sure why you just found out today when Raul left a message
> on your talk page on the 6th, especially since it's not as though you
> weren't around between now and then.
> 
> That said, if this case has been going since August 1st, why didn't
> anyone leave a note on RK's talk page until  a month into the case?

FWIW, I don't think PP was *ever* notified about my case against him.  

Pak