[WikiEN-l] Vigilantism or due process (was: Plautus)

[Rick]

Actually I think you're wrong.  It has accomplished something.  It's accomplished a lot of frustration and the withdrawal of many good editors, and left the asylum in the hands of the inmates.
 
RickK

Gareth Owen <wiki at gwowen.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
It strikes me that the only (partially) succesful rehabilitation of a
troublemaking user (Lir) came through a ban, rather than any "arbitration."
The addition of a layer of committees and bureaucracy has not, as far as I can
tell, achieved anything of any note.
-- 
Gareth Owen
"It's not a human or civic right to edit wikipedia."
-- kq cuts to the core of the banning debate



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Get better spam protection with Yahoo! Mail
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/attachments/20040226/3b695d75/attachment.htm