[WikiEN-l] Re: GNAA on VFD for the fifth time

[Mark Richards]

Deliberate disruption of WP by rampant deletionists
seems to be tollerated for now. I guess it will have
to cause even more damage before anything is done.
Mark

--- "csherlock at ljh.com.au" <csherlock at ljh.com.au>
wrote:

> Ya, I know. But if it's officially sanctioned that
> GNAA can go onto VfD 
> as many times as people want, then that's not
> disruption, right? So then 
> a precedent is set.
> 
> Snowspinner wrote:
> > [[Wikipedia:Don't disrupt Wikipedia to prove a
> point]]
> > 
> > -Snowspinner
> > 
> > On Dec 25, 2004, at 7:26 PM, 
> > csherlock at ljh.com.au wrote:
> > 
> >> Guys, how many times are we going to list this
> before we stop this 
> >> abuse of process? This is now the fifth time the
> article has been on 
> >> votes for deletion and that sucks.
> >>
> >> It seems to me that the deletionists won't stop
> till it's gone. I 
> >> would like to propose that after this vote, we
> never allow it to be 
> >> listed every again.
> >>
> >> If we don't, then I'm considering putting
> [[Childlove movement]] back 
> >> on VfD until I can gather enough support. Clearly
> if we're allowed to 
> >> place GNAA on VfD unlimited times then it will be
> fine to put 
> >> Childlove movement on there till we get rid of
> it.
> >>
> >> Ta bu shi da yu
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> WikiEN-l mailing list
> >> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> >>
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> >>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> 



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
All your favorites on one personal page – Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.com