[WikiEN-l] Re: blanket reverts

[Jimmy O'Regan]

Zoe wrote:

>--- Daniel Ehrenberg <littledanehren at yahoo.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>well that doesn't prohibit unrevereting of his good
>>edits, does it? 
>>--LittleDan
>>    
>>
>
>Yes, it does.  There is no such thing as a good
>Michael edit.  Unless you want to to go the trouble of
>verifying that every single thing he wrote was
>correct, don't even try to think that there is a good
>Michael edit.  
>
Yeah, but they're gradually improving, at least in the examples I've 
seen. His attitude, unfortunately, isn't though.