[WikiEN-l] Re: blanket reverts

[Zoe]

--- Daniel Ehrenberg <littledanehren at yahoo.com> wrote:
> well that doesn't prohibit unrevereting of his good
> edits, does it? 
> --LittleDan

Yes, it does.  There is no such thing as a good
Michael edit.  Unless you want to to go the trouble of
verifying that every single thing he wrote was
correct, don't even try to think that there is a good
Michael edit.  And besides, Jimbo has said he is
banned until he sends him an email saying that he
wants to be reinstated.  He is specifically
contraverting Jimbo's stand on the subject until such
a time, and because of that, and because of the
time-consuming problem of verifying each and every
thing he writes, blanket reversion is the only
recourse.

Zoe


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Calendar - Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).
http://calendar.yahoo.com