Titoxd @ Wikimedia wrote:
Looks good, but there is one bit in the page that has a bit of unclear wording:
"The source code of every tool is licensed under a free (like BSD) or /GPL-compatible/^[1] https://wiki.toolserver.org/view/Toollizenz/draft/en#cite_note-0 license by default, if it is at all possible. If this is not possible due to a less free component (like a code library), the source code adopts the license of the library by default."
Would it be safe to say that the source code would be dual-licensed here, or am I reading it wrong?
Titoxd.
No. That text would allow to use the code under GPL (BSD is itself GPL-compatible).