[QA] RVM and/or rbenv

Željko Filipin zfilipin at wikimedia.org
Wed Jul 2 10:52:26 UTC 2014


On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Chris McMahon <
christopher.mcmahon at gmail.com> wrote:

>  As I recall, it was also because I had recommendations from Ruby experts
> at places like Groupon and Leandog who recommended RVM at the time.


It was a while ago, I have probably forgotten the entire story. I thought I
was pushing for it, but it is likely that it was already in place when I
joined.

Anyway, at the time (a year or two ago) it was probably the way to go. We
might want to revisit that decision now. The Ruby Toolbox says rbenv is
slightly more popular than rvm[1].

Željko
--
1: https://www.ruby-toolbox.com/categories/ruby_version_management
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/qa/attachments/20140702/2afc8870/attachment.html>


More information about the QA mailing list