[Foundation-l] Fwd: Wikimedia Brasil + WMF
Christophe Henner
christophe.henner at gmail.com
Fri Sep 2 17:52:54 UTC 2011
Hi, sorry for top posting.
A quick historical note, really early on some chapters had a WMF representative with a lot of power. We moved from that next to a lawyer recommandation as it created legal links between WMF and chapters hence increasing the legal risks for all the organizations and the safety/sustainability of the whole movement.
If the issue is communication between WMF and chapters there used to be a position at the foundation dedicated to this very purpose, the chapter coordinator. Perhaps it is time to revive this position.
Christophe
Envoye depuis mon Blackberry
-----Original Message-----
From: Jimmy Wales <jwales at wikia-inc.com>
Sender: foundation-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:37:42
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List<foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
Reply-To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Fwd: Wikimedia Brasil + WMF
On 8/28/11 1:00 AM, Ray Saintonge wrote:
> I think that developing such a legal entity should be a high priority
> for Brazilian Wikipedians to ensure that Wiki activities in Brazil are
> controlled by Brazilians. At the same time I don't think there is any
> value to having a WMF appointee on your board; such a person would find
> it difficult to function under circumstances of perpetual conflict of
> interest. No other chapter has such a clause.
I had never thought of this before, but now that it has been mentioned,
I just wanted to disagree, quite respectfully because Ray is awesome of
course, and say that I think it is a very interesting idea to have a WMF
appointee on the boards of chapters.
There should be very few cases where there is a "conflict of interest"
since chapters and the Foundation are deeply tied together always (and
that's a good thing). I think having a Foundation representative on the
board of chapters does present some possibly insurmountable logistical
issues (who will they be?) but I actually think such an arrangement
might be incredibly valuable for improving communication and
*decreasing* perceived conflicts of interest.
--Jimbo
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list