[Foundation-l] Licenses' biodiversity : my big disagreement with the Wikimedia usability initiative's software specifications

[Pronoein]

Le 19/02/2011 10:14, David Gerard a écrit :
> On 19 February 2011 12:56, Teofilo <teofilowiki at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2011/2/19 David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com>:
> 
>>> Please detail the legal problems in question. So far you're making
>>> blank assertions which contradict pretty much everyone else's
>>> understanding of them.
> 
>> In my view, the existence of "Canada French", "Canada English" etc...
>> versions of CC 2.0 affects usability (or uploader-friendliness), but I
>> don't see this as a legal problem.
> 
> 
> And yet you claimed legal problems.
> 
> 
>> `If you are talking about the legal
>> problems I mentioned in my other mail, please have a look at
>> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Crystal_Clear_icons . They
>> are licensed under LGPL (I mentioned GPL in that email, but LGPL is
>> probably enough). LGPL licensing ensures that the SVG code (which is a
> 
> 
> Noine of which is anything whatsoever to do with CC by-sa, which you
> claimed originally to be talking about.
> 
> Unless you can distinguish the concepts you are talking about quite a
> bit more clearly, you will not convince anyone there is a problem in
> the world, as opposed to a problem in your understanding.

I don't want to interrupt. Just wanted to say that I'm monitoring
closely this conversation. I find it of interest and I hope you will
reach at least an understanding of each other that would benefit the
whole community by clarifying what is at stake.