[Foundation-l] Raw data of 2009 Board election ballots

[Anthony]

By the way, has Batzel v. Smith been overturned?  If so, maybe I'll
reconsider.  If not, bring it on.  Maybe I can even get the EFF to defend
me.

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Anthony <wikimail at inbox.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> 2009/8/25 Anthony <wikimail at inbox.org>:
>> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> 2009/8/25 Gregory Kohs <thekohser at gmail.com>:
>> >> > I said a few things that brought the Foundation into a light of
>> >> disrepute.
>> >> > Is that the problem?
>> >>
>> >> If you said anything that could be libellous then that could be a
>> >> problem. Whoever did the publishing would be liable.
>> >
>> >
>> > I'll do the publishing, if that's the problem.  I'm in the United
>> States, so
>> > I'm protected by Section 230 of the CDA.
>>
>> I suggest you run that by a lawyer, my understanding of the CDA is
>> that is isn't that broad.
>>
>
> Nah, I promise, I'll publish it.  I've read enough case law to be confident
> that I couldn't be successfully sued for publishing that audio recording.  I
> also trust Greg not to engage in slander, frankly.  And I'm pretty much
> judgement-proof anyway.
>
> "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as
> the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information
> content provider."
>
> I'm a user of an interactive computer service, and the information was
> provided by another information content provider.
>