[Foundation-l] Global rollback users

[Gerard Meijssen]

Hoi,
What methods do we have to find community consensus. How is it defined, to
what extend can a single project prevent a resolution to a question. Would
such a position have to be based on arguments or just on say so?

This is yet another situation where a project council would prove to be
invaluable.
Thanks,
     GerardM

On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Jesse Plamondon-Willard <
pathoschild at gmail.com> wrote:

> Milos Rancic <millosh at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think that Pedro's approach is better: those users should get right
> > to delete page (as well to undelete if they make a mistake; or it is
> > not necessary?), too. Vandals and spammers are making new pages, too
> > and those pages should be deleted.
>
> I proposed rollback-only because faster reverting probably isn't
> controversial, but being able to delete and restore pages on all wikis
> (including large wikis like en-Wikipedia) is probably much more
> controversial. That's technically possible too, if there is community
> consensus to do it.
>
> --
> Yours cordially,
> Jesse Plamondon-Willard (Pathoschild)
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>