[Foundation-l] 10 thoughts on how to improve the quality of Swedish Wikipedia‏

[Casey Brown]

There's an interesting list on Meta that deals with identifying the
"basic articles" that every Wikipedia should have:
<http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_articles_every_Wikipedia_should_have>.

There are also two on the English Wikipedia,
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CORE> and
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vital_articles>

2008/3/12 Andrew Whitworth <wknight8111 at gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Florence Devouard <Anthere9 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>  >  I very much agree on one of the points "Thought nine: concentration on
>  >  the basic articles".
>
>  I agree with this point too (well, I agree with them all, but i
>  especially like this). Focusing on the "Basic" subjects is something
>  that we've talked about at en.wikibooks a lot in the past, but for
>  which we haven't had enough dedicated participants to really fix. Our
>  books on [[Calculus]] and [[Special Relativity]] are in much better
>  condition then our books on [[Algebra]] or [[Arithmetic]], for
>  example. I can't even find an up-to-date list of all books that we
>  have that fall into this "basic" category. I'll have to go set one up.
>
>  --Andrew Whitworth
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  foundation-l mailing list
>  foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>



-- 
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023

---
Note: This e-mail address is used for mailing lists. Personal emails sent to
this address will probably get lost.