[Foundation-l] Muhammad

[Oldak Quill]

On 10/03/2008, White Cat <wikipedia.kawaii.neko at gmail.com> wrote:
> I really thing the Mohhamed controversy has been going on for far too long
> because of the close-mindness of both sides. Wiki supposed to be free.
> Consensus is often defined as "reaching an agreement" or compromise. We have
> one side who is desperately tying/fighting to keep the image of Mohammed off
> the article, we also have another side that is desperately trying to keep
> the image of Mohammed in the article. Both sides are being no better than
> each other.

As far as I'm aware, the issue isn't that the image is in the article.
The issue is that Wikipedia (or WF) is publishing the image at all.

Where do you suggest the compromise is?

-- 
Oldak Quill (oldakquill at gmail.com)