[Foundation-l] Meta-arbcom (was: the foundations of...)

[effe iets anders]

Guys, please,

The language is just a mere practical matter. Please let's first come
to the conclusion what the *purpose* would be of this meta-arbcom
*before* we even start with discussing issues like this. i know it is
very easy to get into details, but let's remain focussed. Does anyone
have a good proposal for which topics the arbcom should be used and
what type of members we would need?

BR, Lodewijk

2008/1/5, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton op gmail.com>:
> On 05/01/2008, hillgentleman <hillgentleman.wikiversity op gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thomas Dalton,
> >
> >   Sure, but that can be done case-by-case.  I think we both agree
> > that sometimes it is better to use a language other than English.
> >
> >   And that should depend on which "native" language the project is in.
>
> For discussions with the parties, yes, it should be done in whatever
> language is best for the parties and the committee can worry about
> translating things. For discussions within the committee, it's
> quickest and easiest to always use English.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l op lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>