[Foundation-l] Meta-arbcom (was: the foundations of...)

[Thomas Dalton]

On 05/01/2008, hillgentleman <hillgentleman.wikiversity at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thomas Dalton,
>
>   Sure, but that can be done case-by-case.  I think we both agree
> that sometimes it is better to use a language other than English.
>
>   And that should depend on which "native" language the project is in.

For discussions with the parties, yes, it should be done in whatever
language is best for the parties and the committee can worry about
translating things. For discussions within the committee, it's
quickest and easiest to always use English.