[Foundation-l] Meta-arbcom (was: the foundations of...)

[Thomas Dalton]

On 05/01/2008, effe iets anders <effeietsanders at gmail.com> wrote:
> Guys, please,
>
> The language is just a mere practical matter. Please let's first come
> to the conclusion what the *purpose* would be of this meta-arbcom
> *before* we even start with discussing issues like this. i know it is
> very easy to get into details, but let's remain focussed. Does anyone
> have a good proposal for which topics the arbcom should be used and
> what type of members we would need?

It's a practical matter, but I don't think it's a "mere" one. It is a
very important issue that needs to be resolved. What kind of cases the
committee will consider is also an important issue, but there's no
reason we can't discuss them both.