[Foundation-l] Meta-arbcom (was: the foundations of...)

[hillgentleman]

Thomas Dalton,

  Sure, but that can be done case-by-case.  I think we both agree
that sometimes it is better to use a language other than English.

  And that should depend on which "native" language the project is in.

Best,
H.


On 05/01/2008, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 05/01/2008, hillgentleman <hillgentleman.wikiversity at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thomas Dalton,
> >
> > > The arguments from the parties, yes. I'm talking about discussion
> > > within the committee. Once they've heard the arguments they need to
> > > deliberate and reach a conclusion - that deliberation needs to happen
> > > in one language or it's simply impractical.
> >
> >   Then I might have misread your comment.  Yes, that would be useful.
> > That is up to the arbitrators and it is not something that we should bother
> > ourselves with.
>
> It needs to be decided before the committee is chosen, otherwise you
> run of the risk of someone that doesn't speak English getting on the
> committee but then not being able to take part in deliberations
> because they are all in English.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>