[Foundation-l] misleading advice on oversight on wikizine

Thomas Dalton thomas.dalton at gmail.com
Tue Feb 19 19:14:45 UTC 2008

On 19/02/2008, Pedro Sanchez <pdsanchez at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2008 10:38 AM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Then the Foundation will need to review its policy to determine if
> > > oversight is appropiate for removing un-sensitive information from
> > > those pages. Because it has always been emphasized oversight should
> > > not be used unless there's an important reason to do it, and htat's
> > > why 2 out of the 3 cases require Foundation's advice in order to carry
> > > on
> >
> > Why would use deletion to remove un-sensitive information? If it's not
> > sensitive, it can stay in the history.
> >
> The n how does a page not being able to be deleted "increases" the
> need for oversighters? There's still the same need as before, and the
> same channels are available. The wording of wikizine suggest otherwise

I don't understand the question. As far as I can tell, that's the same
question I've already answered. My latest point doesn't contradict my
previous answer.

More information about the foundation-l mailing list