[Foundation-l] misleading advice on oversight on wikizine

Pedro Sanchez pdsanchez at gmail.com
Tue Feb 19 19:11:39 UTC 2008

On Feb 19, 2008 10:38 AM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Then the Foundation will need to review its policy to determine if
> > oversight is appropiate for removing un-sensitive information from
> > those pages. Because it has always been emphasized oversight should
> > not be used unless there's an important reason to do it, and htat's
> > why 2 out of the 3 cases require Foundation's advice in order to carry
> > on
> Why would use deletion to remove un-sensitive information? If it's not
> sensitive, it can stay in the history.

The n how does a page not being able to be deleted "increases" the
need for oversighters? There's still the same need as before, and the
same channels are available. The wording of wikizine suggest otherwise

More information about the foundation-l mailing list