[Foundation-l] [Wikitech-l] Primary account for single user login

[Anon Sricharoenchai]

On 4/8/08, Mark Williamson <node.ue at gmail.com> wrote:
> Why shouldn't it be?
>

It shouldn't be, if it impact many user's right without their consent.
Especially, when they are non-stale user, and are willing to reserve
their right.

>
>  Mark
>
>
>  On 08/04/2008, Anon Sricharoenchai <anon.hui at gmail.com> wrote:
>  > On 4/8/08, Tim Starling <tstarling at wikimedia.org> wrote:
>  >  > Anon Sricharoenchai wrote:
>  >  >  > == Negotiation for consent ==
>  >  >  > Would it be possible to let the conflicting users to resolve the
>  >  >  > conflict by themselves, not by the decision of the automatic system
>  >  >  > using edit-count?
>  >  >  > The renaming of username will be made on their consent.
>  >  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > I think the most important thing is that we don't put any unnecessary
>  >  >  conditions on the deployment of SUL. I would like to see it fully deployed
>  >  >  before I grow old and die.
>  >  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Why should it be fully deployed?
>  >  Is it possible to leave the old unresolved conflicting account forever?
>  >
>  >  P.S. For the case that one can't resolve the conflict, if he REALLY
>  >  want a unify username, they have only 2 options,
>  >  1. rename his existing account
>  >  2. create a new account
>  >
>  >
>
> >  _______________________________________________
>  >  foundation-l mailing list
>  >  foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>  >  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>  >
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  foundation-l mailing list
>  foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>