[Foundation-l] [Wikitech-l] Primary account for single user login

[Mark Williamson]

Why shouldn't it be?

Mark

On 08/04/2008, Anon Sricharoenchai <anon.hui at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/8/08, Tim Starling <tstarling at wikimedia.org> wrote:
>  > Anon Sricharoenchai wrote:
>  >  > == Negotiation for consent ==
>  >  > Would it be possible to let the conflicting users to resolve the
>  >  > conflict by themselves, not by the decision of the automatic system
>  >  > using edit-count?
>  >  > The renaming of username will be made on their consent.
>  >  >
>  >
>  >
>  > I think the most important thing is that we don't put any unnecessary
>  >  conditions on the deployment of SUL. I would like to see it fully deployed
>  >  before I grow old and die.
>  >
>
>
> Why should it be fully deployed?
>  Is it possible to leave the old unresolved conflicting account forever?
>
>  P.S. For the case that one can't resolve the conflict, if he REALLY
>  want a unify username, they have only 2 options,
>  1. rename his existing account
>  2. create a new account
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  foundation-l mailing list
>  foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>