[Foundation-l] Confidentiality agreement with FSF

Gerard Meijssen gerard.meijssen at gmail.com
Tue Apr 15 19:43:40 UTC 2008


Hoi,
You again prove my point.
Thanks,
      GerardM

On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 15/04/2008, Gerard Meijssen <gerard.meijssen at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hoi,
> >  Thomas Dalton does not want to accept that in a relation where specific
> >  people deal with other diplomatically to reach a deal, when the people
> >  involved are the ones representing their very organisations, that these
> >  people have to be able to trust each other. In his misguided ideas he
> >  assumes that he is entitled to have all the details. He does not
> consider
> >  the ramifications of such actions. For me it qualifies as dense. It
> does
> >  because it has already been stated that the point why this is necessary
> will
> >  be made clear when appropriate.
>
> I accept that if the other party insists on confidentiality, then we
> have no choice. That doesn't seem to be the case here. If it was that
> important to them, they would have put it in writing.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>


More information about the foundation-l mailing list